Published extract from Tain Through the
Centuries
R W Munro and Jean Munro @
Tain Town Council 1966

St. Duthac's chapel
ALTHOUGH the 'four corner crosses' of the girth or sanctuary of
St. Duthac have disappeared, like those which marked out other sanctuaries in Scotland, we
know just where three of them stood and we can make a fair guess at the site of the
fourth. The exact area which they enclosed cannot now be measured with absolute certainty,
but it must have been within a trapezium something over twelve square miles in extent that
the law of the medieval church would protect a fugitive against arrest or violence.
The first cross stood about a mile north-east from Tain, on what
was known as Paul McTyre's Hill, which can no longer be distinguished either because the
sea has encroached on the land at this point or else because the sand which formed it has
been dispersed. St. Katherine's Cross stood about half-way along the north shore of Loch
Eye, on a small conical mound near a modern house which uses the old name. Still moving in
a sunwise direction, the next stood somewhere near the foot of Scots burn Glen, below Culpleasant and north of the
hill of Beams a' Chlaidheimh ('Barnsc1ay'). The fourth cross stood on the north side of
Edderton Hill, at the great cairn beside the Red Burn (Allt Dearg) and about half a mile
above the main road.! All four sites are peaceful and accessible enough today, but one
writer was prompted to remark that the confluence of scoundrels attracted by this holy
girth - nearly as large as the modern parish - must have invested life in medieval Tain
with many exciting features.
All that we know of events in Easter Ross during the centuries
which followed the death of Duthac bears out the impression that they were troubled times.
The MalcolmIngibjorg marriage is said to have secured peace for thirty years, but when
the king was killed on his last invasion of England in 1093 the old concept of the
succession of an adult male collateral came into conflict with the new idea of
inheritance by primogeniture, and another dynastic squabble broke out. Those who opposed
the advance of English influence chose Malcolm's brother to be King, while his eldest son
by Ingibjorg marched north with Anglo-Norman aid and held the throne for a brief period as
Duncan JI; he was killed and Donald Bane ruled in his stead, followed by Edgar, Malcolm's
son by Queen Margaret. In these confused waters King Magnus of Norway fished happily, but
his success in the west was not matched in the north, where the Kings of Scots gradually
gained power and acceptance in their own kingdom through the influence of local magnates.
Some of these events came very close "to Tain, if not
actually into its sanctuary, in the twelfth century. Alexander I, his brother David, and the latter's son William the Lion all had
to contend with opposition from descendants of Duncan 11. The spirit of rebellion was
strongest in the North, but even the monks of Melrose heard of and recorded the march of
royal armies into Ross to quell disorders. The great castles of Dunskaith - perched on a
crag above the King'sJFerry at Nigg, the revenues from which helped to secure its upkeep
and Edirdowyr (Redcastle in the Black Isle) were built and strengthened. Further trouble
followed the death of WilIiatn and the accession of Alexander II in 1214, but the
insurgent leaders were seized by Ferquhard, a powerful Highland chief who was apparently
son to the lay parson of Applecross. 'He cut off their heads and presented them as gifts
to the new king', wrote the Melrose chronicler gruesomely, and was rewarded with a
knighthood an<;llater created Earl of Ross.
It was at Tain that Ferquhard - a national figure and the first
of five earls who succeeded each other from father to son _ died in 1252, but he was
buried in the abbey of Fearn which he had founded. Tain was a place of some importance
ecclesiastically - the body of St. Duthac himself is said to have been 'translated'
there in 1253 - but there is no word of a residence fit for an earl in it; Ferquhard and
his successors lived at the castles of Delny or Dingwall, and it was at the latter that
their charters were dated when the earldom, by descent through an heiress, was held by the
Macdonald Lords of the Isles.
Tain and its sanctuary came into unwelcome prominence in the
difficult times of the War of Independence. The Bishops of Ross and Moray were on Bruce's
side, but the Earl of Ross (who was married to a Comyn) at first opposed him in the
struggle for the crown. King Edward of England came north with an army - he reached
Kinloss just across the Moray Firth in 1303, and Cromarty Castle is believed to have held
out against a long siege by his forces. By the summer of 1306, although by now a crowned
king, Bruce's fortunes were at a low ebb and
he sent the Queen and princess Marjorie for safety to the castle of Kildrummy. It too was
threatened by the English and the royal ladies were sent hurriedly northward, probably in
the charge of the Earl of Atholl. They may have planned to seek refuge in Orkney, but
unfortunately they had to pass through the territory of the Earl of Ross, and the first
appearance in history of St. Duthac's sanctuary
is a sorry tale. Barbours Bruce tells us how they rode :
'With knychtis and with squyeris bath,
Throw Ross, rycht to the gyrth of Tayne.
Bot that travaill thai maid in vayne;
For thai off Ross, that wald nocht ber
For thaim na blayme, na yheit (yet) danger,
Owt off the gyrth thame all has tayne;
And syne has send thaim evirilkane
Rycht intill Ingland, to the King,
That girt draw all men, and hing;
And put the ladyis in presoune,
Sum intill castell, sum in dongeoun.'
This is not the only known instance of the sanctuary being
violated, but in the others the cause seems to have been greed and the temptation offered
by the rich possessions of the church. Sometime in the middle or later part of the
fourteenth century - the date is uncertain - a band of lawless Maclennans are said to
have pillaged both Tain and the Chanonry of Ross.
An even worse disaster· befell the shrine of St. Duthac soon
after James I returned from his English exile full of determination to curb the
trouble-makers. The king was to meet the Highland chiefs at Inverness in 1428, and it
seems to have been just before he came that Alexander Mowat, Laird of Freswick, was
returning to Caithness from the south. He had a feud with the owner of Creich and other
lands on the north side of the Dornoch
Firth, Thomas Mackay the son of Neil; at Tain, says one of the two Highland chroniclers
who relate the story, Mowat 'would pay his vow to St. Duthus, and being at his devotion
Thomas Mckneil surprises them, and killed him in the very chappell, which he also burnt,
to which Alex. Mowat retired as to a very sanctuary'. When the king heard of this, Thomas
was at once proclaimed a rebel, and; being betrayed by his own brothers, he was executed
at the castle hill of Inverness. As a warning to others, the murderer's limbs were
dispersed, and 'his right hand set up at Tain, a horrid spectacle' ; in 1430 his brother
Neil received as a reward the lands of Creich which Thomas forfeited.,
This burning of St. Duthac's chapel was of concern to others
besides the unlucky victim and the clergy immediately affected. The white canons of Fearn,
whose abbey had been founded near Edderton about two centuries earlier by Earl Ferquhard,
had moved before the thirteenth century was out to a site within five miles of the chapel
of St. Duthac. This flitting, it has been pointed out, put the sanctuary of Tain between
the abbey and the wild Highlanders of Kincardine parish - a wise precaution for an order
which combined services in parish churches and manual labour with their own religious
observances. Not content with that, the abbot seems to have entrusted his most precious
records to the chapel for safe keeping: for a new charter granted in 1467 records that the
abbey's foundation charter, the papal bull of confirmation, and other deeds, together with
numerous relics, were reduced to ashes with St. Duthac's chapel. It is also sad to think
that some of the early documents relating to Tain may have perished at the same time, for
the town's oldest charter now extant (1587/8) says that their 'old infeftments and
charters were cruelly burnt in a fire caused by certain savage and rebellious Ersch
(Gaelic) subjects'.
But the picture cannot have been one of unrelieved gloom, of a
sanctuary that was never a safe refuge. Just as the newspapers of our own day give
prominence to the exceptional rather than the normal, so we may suppose that many
fugitives found safety when they sought it for everyone who suffered by its violation.
One who remained safely in Tain for several years, although
accused of treason against James 111 along with the king's brother Albany, was William Lord Crichton.
Himself a lowlander, Crichton had family connections in the North: his father (son of
James Il's chancellor) was at one time Earl of Moray in right of his wife, who was also
heiress of Dunbeath and other lands in Caithness. As a part of a process of forfeiture
against him, a macer or messenger summoned him by proclamation at the market crosses of
Banff, Elgin, Forres, Nairn and Inverness without getting any certain knowledge of his
whereabouts. Someone must have talked, however, for on the last day of 1483 the messenger passed 'to the town of Thane in
Ross, where the Lord Creichtoun lived in the vicar's house', and summoned his lordship to
appear in parliament at Edinburgh to answer for his treason. Witnesses included a bailie
of Tain (William Johnsoun) and of Cromarty, a burgess of Inverness, and Lord Crichton's 'brother and familiar follower'
Alexander Sutherland. Failing to appear, he was forfeited and outlawed in his absence; and
although parliament knew where he was lodged no further action is recorded and it is not
known how, when or where he died.
By this time the earldom of Ross had fallen to the crown through
the repeated rebellion of its holders, who as Lords of the Isles acted the part of
independent sovereigns. Donald of Harlaw had claimed the earldom to which his wife was
heiress, and had fought for it against the king's own forces. His son Alexander of the
Isles had also rebelled, begged for clemency at Holyrood house, and been reinstated after
a spell in Tantalion castle. In January 1436, as Earl of Ross and Lord of the Isles, he
granted the lands ofScardy, Plaids and others, and the office of 'baillie of the immunity
of Tain' to Alexander MacCulloch by a charter dated at the castle of Dingwall. The same
office - it was to last for more than 300 years - was held in 1458 by John McCulloch, to
whom Earl John addressed a letter as 'bailie of the girth of Sanct Duthowis'.
At this time the earl was at peace with King James, but it was
not long before he was back at the old intrigues. These reached a peak with the so-called
treaty of Ardtornish (or Westminster-Ardtornish) of 1462, by which he promised his own and
his followers' allegiance to Edward IV of England and their support in his wars against
the Scots. It was some time before this came to light, but Ross was probably involved in
its earl's rebellion along with other parts of the North. He was himself at Tain on 12th
April 1463, when he put his seal to a charter (the only one known by an Earl of Ross which
has Tain as its place of origin) to Donald Corbatt of the lands of Easter Arde. The list
of witnesses - Finlay Abbot of Fearn, William Thane of Cawdor, John Munro of Foulis, and
even a Maclean from Mull and MacQuarrie of Ulva - suggests that he still had his army, or
at any rate his council, around him.
The inevitable eventually happened. Forfeited in 1475, he was
later pardoned but forced to surrender the earldom of Ross, which was annexed to the crown
and appointed to remain with the king's second son. At Edinburgh in July 1476 John Lord of
the Isles put his seal - now showing only the galley with double tressure, no longer
quartered with the three lions rampant of Ross - to a terse but comprehensive
renunciation of the earldom and the offices of sheriff of Inverness and Nairn, binding
himself and his heirs never to offer any impediment or obstacle to the king, his
chamberlains, officers, servants and vassals, etc. His father's humiliation in the
sanctuary of Holyrood may have been more abject, but it could not have been more complete.
As the galley of the Isles sailed back into the Hebridean mists, severing a 200-yearold
link with the sanctuary of St. Duthac and the town which was growing up beside it, there
were signs that a new epoch was already beginning for the church and community of Tain.

Collegiate church
Ross was one of the three northern dioceses of Scotland in the
Middle Ages, and, like its neighbours to the north and south - Caithness and Moray - it
took its name from the province and not from the town in which its cathedral church was
built. From the Hill of Tain, as it happens, you can still see Dornoch Cathedral across
the firth, once the heart of the See of Caithness and now largely rebuilt; on a clear day
it might almost bave been possible to glimpse the twin towers of the sister church at
Elgin, glory of the bishopric of Moray; but the rounded ridge of the Black Isle hides from
view the Cathedral Church of Ross, of which enough remains in the burgh of Fortrose to
show that it must have been 'an architectural gem of the very first description'.
In the absence of diocesan and cathedral records, we can form a
general idea of the diocese of Ross. Tain was one of its 35 parishes, all on the mainland,
stretching from Tarbat in the east to Applecross in the west. Under the bishop were four
principal dignitaries - the dean, preceptor, chancellor and treasurer - and several lesser
ones, and with them a-body of about twenty canons formed the chapter of Ross. Each had for
his maintenance an allowance derived from the revenues of some parish church or churches
in the diocese (where he was obliged to support a resident vicar), those of Tain and
Edderton being enjoyed by the sub-dean. In addition, there were sanctuaries protected by
the influence of the Church at Applecross and Tain, and two of the religious orders had
establishments in the North - a priory of the Valliscaulians at Beauly, and an abbey of
the Premonstratensians or White Canons at Fearn.
The reputation of St. Duthac and his sanctuary ensured that Tain
would not sink to the level of a forgotten parish, solely dependent on the services of a
poorly rewarded vicar. The 'translation' of Duthac's body from Armagh to Tain is
recorded in 1253, showing that Tain was regarded as worthy of honour, and that its
sanctity was to be increased. As was only fitting, it long treasured various personal
relics of the saint cane heid of silver callit sanct Duthois hede', his breast-bone, his
shirt (supposed to protect its wearer from death or injury), his cup and his bell.
But an important step in advancing the importance of Tain as an
ecclesiastical centre was taken by Robert the Bruce himself. In allowing an amnesty to
William Earl of Ross, who had handed John of Atholl over to execution (probably when the
Queen was taken), the king expressly stipulated that Ross should 'maintain at his own
expense six chaplains to say masses for Earl John at St. Duthac's church'. The English too
must have had an inkling of Tain's reputation, for when the next Earl of Ross was killed
at Halidon Hill, in spite of wearing the miraculous shirt, they thoughtfully returned it.
A member of the great house of Douglas, too, is said to have had the pious intention of
leaving one of his robes to be added to the sanctuary's vestments, although there is
some doubt whether this was ever carried out.
The records of the day show that Duthac was accorded the title of 'Saint' long before it was formally conferred by the apostolic
see. It was Archibald Earl of Douglas who, both by special envoy and by letters,
represented to Pope Martin V his suitability for canonisation. This was described as the
wish of the entire Scottish people in the humble petition drawn up by James Haldenstone,
Prior of St. Andrews, probably soon after visiting Rome in 1418,1 While not wishing to
weary His Holiness by recounting the candidate's many miracles, enough was said to show
the nationwide fame which he had achieved.
Precedent required - as the eloquent prior well knew - that many
careful and exact inquiries must be made before a new name was added to the roll of
saints; that Duthac's survived the inquisition may be presumed from the fact that it has
long been allotted a place in the Roman calendar under the 8th of March. Bishop
Elphinstone, whose brief tenure of the See of Ross before he went to Aberdeen is worth
remembering, selected nine passages on the life of St. Duthac from Irish and Scottish
writings and legends to be recited in his diocese on that day.
Tain took its place among other religious centres in the North
when, in 1456, Alexander Sutherland of Dunbeath directed that it should be one of the six
places where masses should be said for his soul (the total of 30 successive masses was
made up by having 8 in Chanonry, 4 each in Fearn, Tain, Dornoch and Kinloss, and 6 in
Orkney). This Caithness laird, who was married to a sister of Alexander Earl of Ross and
Lord of the Isles, evidently had lodgings ('ynnys') of a kind in Tain, where he is on
record as leaving three 'kists' full of gear.
A year later came the first sign of devotion by a Stewart monarch
to Tain and its saint. At Inverness on 10th October, 1457, James II endowed a chaplaincy
in the parish church in honour of the Virgin Mary, the blessed Duthac confessor, and for
the souls of his father, his mother and his own queen. The charter, witnessed by John Earl
of Ross and Lord of the Isles, speaks of 'ecclesia collegiata S. Duthaci de Tayne', and directs I hat the chaplain is to celebrate mass daily at the high altar,
and at the beginning of each to exhort the people to say a pater noster with a Salutacione
Angelica and to be present in the choir at matins, high mass, and vespers in his habit
like the other chaplains of the church. For his maintenance the lands of Dunskaith were
allocated, and also two merks from the profits of the king's ferry from Cromarty to Nigg.
As the number of its clergy grew, St. Duthac's church at Tain
gradually came to have a communal existence. This is made plain by the use, rather
prematurely, of the term 'collegiate', which is also used in referring to a grant by the
Earl of Ross before 1468 of a mill and lands - evidently those of Morangie - to support a
sacrist. In 1482, James III followed his father's example by endowing a chaplainry at St.
Duthac's to say masses for the souls of his father, mother and wife, and gave the lands of
Newmore to Thomas Monelaw and his successors as chaplains.
Masses were said for the souls of lesser folk as well as for
royal personages. In June 1487 Thomas Ross, sub-dean of the cathedral church, granted to
'the chaplains and deacons' of the church of St. Duthac the lands of Priestown commonly
called 'Balnasagyrde', lying within the lands of Tain and near the king's way; sixteen
plough oxen and two horses belonging to these lands; and a further 'croft' of land. The
first grant was for the welfare of his own soul and those of William Ross of Easter
Kindeace, his own mother, and all the faithful departed; the second to pay for one mass
for the queen every seventh day on all the Mondays at the altar of St. Marie in the parish
church of Tain and after vespers for the safety of the queen; and the third was for the
celebration of 'our obit' (or death anniversary) likewise annually at the altar of St.
Marie. For performing these duties the clerks were to be paid two shillings in the year,
twelve pennies at Pentecost and twelve at St. Martin ..
Finally, the chapel of Saint Duthac of Tayne, bishop,
confessor, and priest, was erected in 1487 into a collegiate church for a provost, five
canons, two deacons or sub-deacons, a sacrist with an assistant clerk, and three singing
boys. This was done with the assent of his chapter by Thomas Hay, Bishop of Ross, at the
instance of James Ill, for the weal of his soul and of the souls of his predecessors and
successors kings of Scotland, and of all who had contributed anything towards the
foundation, by a charter dated 12th September, which passed the Great Seal on 3rd
December.
Many of these collegiate churches were founded in Scotland during
the fifteenth century, but they had no connection with education. They were, in fact,
incorporated bodies of clergy whose primary function was to sing masses for the souls of
the founder (in this case the king himself), his family, friends and heirs in perpetuity.
The 'college' was thus basically a glorified chantry, but the service attained a beauty
and dignity which was impossible with only one priest. As in cathedrals, the usual daily
services were provided, but on a smaller scale.
Although subject to some supervision by his bishop, the provost
of a collegiate church was a man with wide powers and responsibilities. In Tain, he was
invested with full ecclesiastical authority over all his clergy, and also full
jurisdiction over them, their familial's and servitors dwelling in the town of Tain. He
could suspend or excommunicate any of them, and he also had the power of excommunication
and absolution over the inhabitants of the three 'touns' - Tarlogie, Morangie and
Canibuscurrie - within the girth of Tain whose teinds or tithes were granted (by consent
of Thomas Ross, the rector of Tain) for maintaining the fabric of the church and repairing
its ornaments and books, and the 'toun' of Newmore, recently added to the foundation by
the king.
For his own maintenance the provost was given the vicarage of
Tain, which he himself continued to hold, and the escheats (fines) of the courts of the
town of Tain were also allotted to him.
The five canons or prebendaries, declared the charter, were to be
regularly qualified priests, trained in morals, literature and especially singing. They
were bound to be present with the other officials at matins, vespers and other canonical
hours and masses, in good surplices made at their own expense, and to sing at the mass De
Corpore etc. every Thursday. One of the five was to be chosen by the provost to
preside in his absence, and to celebrate a private mass daily for the welfare (status) of
the king, his ancestors and his successors.
Of the four other canons, one was to rule the choir in singing
und to instruct the three choir boys; the two deacons or subdeacons were to be regularly
instructed and sufficiently qualified in singing and in literature; and the sacrist, also
trained in singing and literature, was to have under him an assistant with a surplice and
becoming dress, who should ring the bell and supply fire and water in the church. The
charter laid down exactly how all these were to be maintained, and who was to appoint
them. The five canons, for instance, drew their revenues from Newmore, Dunskaith,
Tarlogie, Morangie and Cambuscurrie; the two deacons were to have for their maintenance
six merks Scots each from the lands of Invereathie and Tain, and the choir boys were to be
paid three merks or forty shillings Scots by John Munro of Foulis, John Merschell of
Davochcarty, and the heirs of Andrew Alanesoun and their successors.
All these officials were bound continually to reside in the
college, and not to be absent above eight days, or even so long without the licence ofthe
provost or his deputy. Should they be longer absent, even in the courts of the king, the
bishop or the earl, they would forfeit their offices - not even the pope himself could
release them from continual residence. So much weight was attached to this that all had to
swear obedience to these statutes, and especially to that relating to residence and the
invalidity of any dispensation.
The first Provost of the Collegiate Church was Thomas Monelaw (or
Monylawe), who had been chaplain of Newmore in 1482. Two years later, as perpetual vicar
of the parish church of Tain and a notary public, he witnessed a charter by John Ross of
Balnagown and other 'common citizens and clerks' of Tain. In 1486, while holding the same
office, he granted property in the town to his cousin Donald Monelaw, with a William and
John Monelaw among the witnesses. Thomas appears on record as provost a few months before
the bishop's charter setting up the collegiate church (when he witnessed the grant by
Thomas Ross already referred to), and again in October, 1487, but he was provost for not
much longer than three years. His early disappearance from the records gave rise to the
erroneous idea that he was dismissed but he actually died in officc in January, 1491; and
in recording his death the Kalendar of Fearn (a manuscript found at Dunrobin, and not yet
printed in full) shows that he left the collegiate church richer by a silver head of S1.
Duthac. Monelaw's successor William Spynie held the office for more than twenty years, and
his long provostship is memorable for Pope Innocent VIII's confirmation of the foundation
carter of the collegiate church, and for the almost annual pilgrimages to the shrine of
St. Duthac by King James IV.
Pope Innocent's bull of 1492 is one of the most treasured
possessions of the Royal Burgh of Tain today. It measures only 14 inches by 9, and
attached to it (by a silken cord in which red and yellow strands mingle, to show that it
contains matter of justice as well as grace) is the original lead seal in perfect
condition. The Pope himself could have had little if any part in the transaction, for he
died only eight days later after a long and painful illness; but the parchment which
carries his name in decorative capitals, 'INNOCENTUS', bears the signature of (and was
perhaps prepared by) a man of even greater eminence - Alessandro Farnese, then
cardinal-secretary, who later wore the triple crown as Paul Ill, and was the pope who
excommunicated Henry VIII of England. The bull, dated at S1. Peter's in Rome on 17th
July, 1492, is addressed to William Spynie, provost of the church of the blessed Duthac of
Tain, in Ross, on whose behalf the petition had been brought.
Gone now were the days when Tain boasted nothing but a hermit
priest living the simple life in the chapel on the knoll whose ruins we know today. The
hermit remained, as we learn from Tain's most famous pilgrim, but what had been the simple
parish church on the terrace above had blossomed into a grander structure. The nave, with
a choir very long in proportion, would still be used for parochial purposes, and the
chancel would be enlarged to fit in with the church's collegiate status. The sacred
relics, much venerated for themselves and also a valuable source of revenue, were kept in
the 'revestre' when not in use, had an important place in the liturgy, and were carried in
procession in costly reliquaries. There was also a chapter house where the clergy could
convene to transact business, and a schoolhouse, but of both all trace has now
disappeared. Some of the great walls to be seen nearby - said to be connected with the
church by underground passages, and later to raise speculations about a dubious 'castle'
",may have been part of the living quarters for the college clergy and their
dependents, who must have formed a considerable community.
James IV came first to Tain as a young man of 21, on the
threshold of a life which was to be devoted to solemn expiation (he blamed himself for
having been accessory to his father's death five years earlier), culture and gaiety, and
the improvement of his people's condition, in not unequal parts. Tantalisingly brief,
but sometimes revealing, the records mention some 18 different visits from the first in
October 1493 to the last in August 1513 - the month before he fell at Flodden. Four or
five years in the sequence are blank, but it is by no means certain that what had become
such a regular event did not take place in them as well.
It was for only a day or two at a time that the king 'lichtit'
(alighted) at Tain, but sometimes (as in 1497) there were two visits in the same year, or
even three; most of them were in the summer months, but he also made the journey at Easter
and in March, October and November. This constant loyalty to St. Duthac's shrine is
remarkable, for James also made an annual pilgrimage to Whithorn (at the other end of his
kingdom), and frequently visited remote shrines such as that on the Isle of May, as well
as looking after the interests of a country which needed a firm and vigilant monarch to
rule over it.
There was, perhaps, some pleasure in moving about his kingdom
with only a small escort, and beating for a day or two those who pursued him with the
business of state. (There is record of only one charter which he granted while at Tain a
confirmation to Alexander Guthrie of some lands in Angus in 1511.) The king would usually
come North by Aberdeen and Elgin - once he made a call at Kingussie - with some time for
hunting or other entertainment on the way; then round the head of the firths by Inverness,
Beauly and Dingwall, or across the ferries of Ardersier and Cromarty with pious halts at
the Chanonry of Ross and Rosemarkie. Extra boats would he needed for his
servants and gear, which on at least two occasions included a portable organ for use at
Tain. Within a month of his marriage to Margaret Tudor, offerings were made at Tain for
the king and queen, and she rode with him by way of Elgin on his Easter pilgrimage in
1510; but on other occasions he travelled light, rapidly and alone, as in that astonishing
journey recorded by a later Bishop of Ross those who experienced it may have told him of
the royal hustle - when James rode in one day from Stirling through Perth and Aberdeen to
Elgin (130 miles), slept on a table in his riding clothes, and after rising at daylight
and covering another forty miles in the saddle, reached Tain in time to hear mass at St.
Duthac's. On his last visit, according to local tradition, James passed barefoot along the
stony track south of the town still known as the King's Causeway.
Just how much money was disbursed during these visits is known
from accounts of the royal expenditure. In 1495 they record the first payment of £5 to be
paid every half year to a chaplain to say masses for the soul of James III - for the
priest (as later entries succinctly put it) 'that singis for the King in Tayne'. In Tain
itself the main items were for offerings: there seem to have been five principal
'stances', and in 1506 the king handed out 14 shillings each (this was apparently the
regular donation at a religious place) to the 'relics' on arrival, in the 'chappell be est
Tayn', to the relics at the revestry, in the 'stok' ofthe town, and on the 'bred'. Then
there was 5s. to the hermit at St. Duthac's chapel and to the pardoner with St. Duthac's
cup, 4s. to the man that bore St. Duthac's 'cabok' (alb, shirt), 3s. to the man who
carried St. Duthac's bell, and 2s. to the poor folk at the gate. In most years there was
also even heavier expense in providing further 'relics' (or more probably reliquaries in
which to keep them), when the value of the silver, the craftsman's fee, and the cost of
gilding might total as much as £28 4s. For 'a cas of silver to the croce the King offerit
to Sanct Duthow', weighing 9t oz., the goldsmith received £6 Os. 3d.; but another item
shows that the cost of the precious metal at least might be saved by economical
housekeeping, as one relic was made from 'ane of the auld silver platis brokin' containing
23.5- oz.
From entries for 1498 and 1505, it appears that the king of
lodged with the vicar of Tain (this was the provost of the collegiate church, William
Spynie), and presumably the parish revenues would have to pay for maintaining the royal
guest and his household. There are, however, payments for 'extras', which show that all
was not solemnity and ceremonial: such as 28s. 'for the King's be1cheir (entertainment) in
Tayn', and 14s. to the laird of Balnagown's harper.
James V was less the pious pilgrim than his father, and as he was
only an infant at the time of Flodden he was at first the pawn of his nobles. Among his
early tutors was Sir David Lindsay, poet and herald, who may have told him of his father's
devotion to images, such as:
'Sanct ringane, of ane rottin stoke,
Sanct Duthow, borit out of ane bloke,
Sanct Androw, with his croce in hand ... .'
So great a concourse of pilgrims flocked to the shrines of the
Scottish saints that even in England verse-makers wrote after Flodden of 'Saint Andrew
with his shored croce' and Saint Ninian of 'Quhytehorn'. They even took such liberties
with the name of one saint that those who venerated it would hardly recognise Duthac as
'Doffin, their demigod of Ross'.
These were increasingly hard days for the old religion, and there
is a link between Easter Ross and the new ideas of Luther and Erasmus in the person of
Patrick Hamilton, the first Scottish martyr of the Reformation. At the age of fourteen he
received the revenues of the abbey of Fearn to enable him to study on the Continent, where
he absorbed the new teachings so eagerly that he must propound them to his countrymen at
home. Brought to loggerheads with the archbishop, he was summoned to St. Andrews in 1528
to answer for his faith; and by a strange coincidence, it is said that the clergy
persuaded the young king to go on pilgrimage to the shrine of St. Duthac so that he could
not attempt to save the Abbot of Fearn from the stake. It is certainly suggestive that
Hamilton should have suffered on 29th February, and that James should be 'in the north
country' in that month and had just returned from 'the extreme parts of his realm' a bare
month after the 'reek' of Master Patrick Hamilton had begun to 'infect as many as it blew
upon'. It is certain that James was in Tain at Easter 1534, when Ross Herald passed to
London 'with writingis to the ambassatouris' and returned to St. Duthac's with answers to
the King's grace; more than a year later a silver 'relic' of the saint, weighing 36 oz.
and costing £5 to make and £7 to gild, was delivered to the king, and later 3s. was
spent on two ells of canvas, presumably for wrapping it up.
By this time old William Spynie had gone to his rest, and Donald
Munro (whose nephew and namesake wrote an account of the Western Isles) was provost of the
collegiate kirk. The rapid line-up for that office - five presentees are named within just
over three years - suggests unsettled times; the last of them (John Thornton) is on record
in 1544 as enjoying a rather unhandy plurality by being also precentor of Moray. With his
approval, Nicholas Ross feued the lands of his chaplainry of Dunskaith and the profits of
the queen's ferry at Cromarty to his son Nicholas (recently legitimated), or to his three
other natural sons in succession, and they might also build a 'sufficient house and other
necessary policies'. About the same time, the chaplain of Newmore (John Bisset), with
consent of the queen and the bishop, gave a feu charter of his church lands to a
neighbouring laird.
Grave abuses were freely admitted to exist in the Scottish church
at this time, but the difficulty was to find a method of removing them. The clergy who saw
the writing on the wall would naturally be anxious to ensure that they and their families
were not ulJ.provided for, if the opportunities on which they had been able to count
became closed to them. In this atmosphere of clerical immorality, plurality of offices,
and appropriation of church lands, Nicholas Ross the younger was appointed provost of the
collegiate church of Tain in March 1548/9, and the scene was set for the last decade of
the old order and its final disappearance.
This is not the place to recount in detail the progress the Reformation in Scotland, but its impact on Tain
can be gauged by three events which quickly followed each other in the year 1560. On 16th
June, the queen regent's presentee to the vacant chaplainry of Newmore (a younger son of
Munro of Foulis) was given possession through a procurator at the church in which it was
founded 'by touching or delivery of the iron ring of the north door as also of the south
door of said collegiate church'. Just a month later, Alexander Ross of Balnagown received
from his 'speciale friend' Nicholas Ross, commendator of Fearn and provost of Tain, 'ane
hede of silver callit sanct Duthois hede his chast blede [breast-bone] in gold and his
ferthyr [case, or portable shrine] in silver gyIt with gold', and bound himself under a
penalty of 2,000 merks that these relics 'sal be furcht cum and to the said provest and
college of Tayne and all uthers heffand entres [having interest] thairto by just titill'.
One month later again, in mid-August, 'Nicholas of Ferne' sat among the representatives of
the three estates of the realm in the 'Reformation Parliament' at Edinburgh, and voted
with the majority (along with Robert Munro of Foulis) for accepting the reformed
Confession of Faith, and forbidding the saying of mass and the exercise of all authority
derived from Rome.
This brought to an end the activities for which the collegiate
church existed. Its ceremonial ceased, and its relics, no longer venerated, were in the
hands of strangers; but the structure survived, even if stripped of its finery, and the
clergy were allowed to enjoy the fruits of their benefices, all but one-third which was to
be devoted to augmenting the crown revenues and paying stipends to the Reformed clergy.
The bishop of Ross (Henry Sinclair and his successor John Leslie the historian) adhered to
the old church, but among those who went with the Reformers were the archdeacon,
chancellor and treasurer of the diocese.
Many of the collegiate churches became parish churches, and
presentations to prebends and chaplainries in some of them continued. An Act of 1567
ordained that patrons might grant benefices
as bursaries to students at the universities. Nicholas
Ross retained the offices of provost and vicar of Tain until May 1567, and he died in
September 1569; on his demission the parson of Alness, Thomas Ross, was appointed to hold
the benefice and provostry as he would have done 'of auld before the alteratioun of the
stait of religioun'. Up to 1587, when church lands were appropriated to the crown by Act
of Parliament, the revenues of Newmore, Morangie, Tarlogie, Cambuscurrie and Dunskaith
were granted regulary to boys for their support 'at the scule', and even for studies at
Edinburgh and Cambridge.
And so, with more gradualness and less violence than is generally
associated with the Reformation in Scotland, the old system of religious observance and
ecclesiastical privilege changed its form or vanished entirely. But the town of Tain,
which had grown up and found recognition under its shadow, remained and continued to
develop.

![]()
Market Cross
BURGHS as we know them in Scotland today have an ancient origin,
and the privileges of exclusive trade and commerce for which they came into existence
reach back into the years before such matters were recorded in detail. Some of the earlier
burghs still possess their foundation charters, however, or at least can point to
authentic evidence of their granting; others have later charters which say specifically
that they are renewing a right or confirming a position already granted by royal or noble
authority; others again can show that they bore the burdens and responsibilities of
burghal status before their rights to it can be established by anything stronger than
tradition; while of some it must be presumed, in the absence of any proof to the
contrary, that like Topsy they just 'growed'.
These varied origins are illustrated, to some extent at least, in the story of Tain and the other Ross-shire burghs. Dingwall had a
charter of erection from Alexander II in 122617, according to a later confirmation;
Cromarty makes its first appearance as a burgh in 1264; there are some grounds for placing
the existence of Rosemarkie also as a burgh in the thirteenth century; but the latest
expert opinion admits that Tain's origin as a burgh 'presents unanswerable questions'. It
is not denied, however, that its eminence as a sanctuary and place of pilgrimage dates
from much earlier than any recorded reference to it as a burgh, and in fact it attracted
to itself from an early date trading privileges comparable to those given to the great
abbeys of the south.
Our only evidence for the trading rights conferred on the liberty
or immunitas of Tain by Ma1colm Canmore (who reigned from 1058 to 1093), and
confirmed by his royal sucessors is the report of an inquiry or inquest which sat at Tain
on 22nd April 1439. Reference has
already been made to their findings , but as the original document is missing , and there
is no other bearing on this event , it is not now possible to learn the reason for such an
inquiry. In the copy which has come down to us
, this testimony is regarding the ancient origin and trading privileges of Tain is said to
bear the seal of Alexander Earl of Ross and Lord of the Isles, the Kings Justiciar
north of the Forth; and the sederunt at Tains first recorded meeting contains a formidable list of names, some
recognizable as those of known individuals , and others
which recur often in the History of Easter Ross.
Just three years earlier for instamce the Earl had appointed Alexander MacCullochh
as his deputy with the title of 'Bailie of the Immunity of Tain', and this family held the
office and the lands of Plaids for some 136 years, first under the earls and then direct
from the king.
Tain's growing importance is reflected in another document, known
through an official copy made from the original for the Lords of Council by the Clerk
Register in 1564. It is a charter by the king
himself, James 11, dated at Inverness on 12th October, 1457; Tain must have been much in
his mind just then, for only two days earlier he had endowed a chaplaincy in its parish
church. It has been translated as follows:-
Know that we for the praise and honour of God Omnipotent and of
St. Duthac have approved ratified and by this our present charter have confirmed the
infeft· ments donations and concessions made and granted in times past by our
predecessors Kings of Scots to the said St. Duthac and to his collegiate church of Tain
and those inhabiting the town itself with the immunity granted them within the four corner
crosses placed around the limits of the bounds of Tain and all liberties and privileges
whatsoever hitherto granted them by our said predecessors as freely quietly fully wholly
honourably well and in peace as the chaplains clerics and inhabitants possessed and
enjoyed the said immunity and liberties and privileges foresaid
but he added a
cautious rider that the confirmation must not prejudice the burgesses of Inverness or
interfere with their privileges. There, of course, was the rub, for Inverness was the
emporium of the Highlands; it had been a royal burgh for some 300 years, and had four
charters from William the Lion conveying important and exclusive economic privileges over
a wide area. The interests of the two were bound to clash, and in spite of the express
reservation the people of Inverness seem to have taken alarm. They appealed to the king or
his advisers to prevent any encroachment on their rights, and ten days later - after lames
had returned south - a royal letter made it abundantly clear that anything which Tain
might gain was not to be at the expense of Inverness.
That this was more than a tiff between two burghs is shown by the
fact that the Earl of Ross - grandson of that Donald of Harlaw who had given Inverness to
the flames only 50 years before - seconded the royal wishes. He wrote in 1458 ordering his
bailie of the girth of St. Duthac, lohn MacCulloch, and the inhabitants of Tain to help
and defend their neighbours of Inverness and to allow no impediment to be made to them in
carrying on trade as authorised by the king.
The not unnatural jealousy shown by the magistrates of Inverness
was to keep the northern towns at loggerheads for another century and a half, simply
because privileges were granted to each which must lead to conflict. The trouble came to a
head again at the end of 1493, when lames IV was in Inverness a month after his first
recorded visit to St. Duthac's shrine. He was told - and perhaps he may have seen for
himself - that customable goods from Ross, Sutherland and Caithness which should have been
brought before the royal customs officers and searchers at Inverness, and there paid the
proper duties, had 'of long time byegone' gone instead 'to the burgh (sic) of
Tain', where the duties had been collected by 'the bailies and community' and withheld by
them to the prejudice of both the royal treasury and the burgh of Inverness.
The king and council determined that this should stop, or they
would know the reason why. The people of Tain and the northern shires must in future bring
their merchandise to the market of Inverness as their principal market, under the pain of
forfeiting them, 'unto the time that they show if they have privileges or freedoms to the
contrary of old'. It is not unlikely that the Inverness magistrates advised the king - as
they were to do later with less reason - that Tain had no such authority to produce.
Acting on this order, which was signed in the king's name on 12th November, the local
sheriff made it known in Tain, probably by proclamation, in presence of Angus MacCulloch
of Plaids and three bailies of the town.
Any effect this may have had was apparently short-lived, for the
burgh of Inverness maintained vigorous legal proceedings between 1499 and 1501 against
Tain, and also against Dingwall. Fourteen inhabitants of Tain were summoned to appear
before the king and his council at Inverness, and after several hearings, the Tain men
were ordered to desist from the trading objected to, unless they could produce their
authority. [n July 1501, the council continued the case with the consent of both parties
'in the hope of concord' till the next justice aire at Elgin.
That is the last we hear of the dispute for some time, but the
'greit enormytie and trespass' which hadgrown up in the remoter parts of the wide
sheriffdom of Inverness was one of the reasons for an Act of Parliament in March 1503/4
creating a separate Sheriff of Ross - to sit 'in Thane or Dinguale' according to the case
to be dealt with - and a Sheriff of Caithness to sit at Dornoch or Wick.
These proceedings throw some light on Tain's early trade and
traders. Skins, hides, salmon, iron and other merchandise are all mentioned - one of the
sites of old iron workings is near Edderton, where bog iron is found. In the mid-sixteenth
century 'casualties' were payable to the hcreditary bailie for the brewing of ale, peats,
beef and fish; among the crops were oats and bere and stock included sheep and capons.
Sugar and spices, as well as coats of mail and cannon, were being imported through
Cromarty.
The names of the Tain men alleged to have been buying and selling
are Alexander (or David) Dean, James Tulloch, Donald MacCulloch, John Davidson, Hugh
Alexanderson, George Munro, Donald Paterson (Patrickson), Laurenceson,Magnus Faed, Steven
Fudes (Fyddes), Donald Brabner, Andrew Forres, Cristy Chapman, Alexander Smyth, and 'ane
called Gillaspy'. Fifteen years later, Alexander Smyth and another from Tain are charged
with helping three Dundee burgesses to buy salmon and grilse and ship them without paying
customs.
Tain was now achieving some corporate existence, no longer wholly
ecclesiastical. A charter of 1484 witnessed by Thomas Monelaw, which has already been
mentioned, was granted by a number of 'common citizens and clerks of the town of the kind
confessor blessed S1. Duthac of Tayne with other common citizens and clerks of our
community'. They include several neighbouring lairds and a number of people known only by
patronymic, as follows:- John Ross of Balnagown, John Munro of Foulis, Masters Donald and
William Ross, Angus MacCulloch of Plaids, William Maktyre of Innerathie, Angus MacCulloch
of Tarrell, John Wauss of Lochslyn, John Mercall of Dawachcartye, Finlay and John Faid,
Patrick son of John, Stephen Foress, William Clark, Donald Red son of Tormot, Donald Red
son of Michael, John Makaryne, John son of Patrick, Finlay McCarryn, John son of Donald,
David Broug, Donald Maktyre, William Pedison, John Red, Donald Talzour, Robert Tulloch,
Patrick Fores, Finlay Makbei, Donald McFersoun and Thomas McFerson.
This group of people, using 'our seal' (which from a document
of about the same time was 'the common seal of the said toun of Tayne') granted a piece of
land in the town to the Subdean of Ross (Thomas Ross), and later sasine was given by
Patrick Johnstoun 'our bailie'. The word 'burgh' is not used, and the earliest extant
charter granting that status was still a century ahead, but we are now coming to a time
when the designation creeps. even into the most formal documents, and when Tain was
assuming the responsibilities of such a status. The first royal document in which Tain is
called a burgh that has yet come to light is the letter sent in the king's name after a
privy council meeting at Inverness in November 1493 (although the 1499/1501 series
ofletters studiously refer to the 'town' of Tain as distinct from the 'burgh' of
Inverness); it figures as a burgh in the Acts of the Lords Auditors in 1494 and 1496; it
appears in a list of burghs and bounds whose customs were granted to the captain of
Stirling Castle under a privy seal letter in 1505, and in a list of 1524 of certain
northern burghs in which the Abbot of Arbroath possessed rights.
Applying the test of when Tain began to pay its share of the
burdens rather than claim or even be accorded burghal status, we find it making a
contribution in 1532/3 for conveying the king's artillery to the Border. Its name is on
the earliest stent roll of the Convention of Royal Burghs in 1535, when it paid taxes
twice - once for the king's journey to France for a bride, and once for the defence of the
Borders. Its commissioners occasionally attended meetings of the Convention (e.g., Andro
Rysie in 1581, Finlay Manson in 1586), and in 1567 it was even represented in Parliament,
although the records do not say by whom. But when we learn that Arbroath (for example) was
stented more than a century before becoming a royal burgh, and was in Parliament twenty
years before receiving a formal charter, it is plain that there were many anomalies in
practice, even though burghs had enjoyed a formally recognised status as early as the
mid-twelfth century.
The use of the terms 'provost' and 'bailies' has sometimes been
thought to indicate the existence of a burgh, but a statement by Nicholas Ross which has
been preserved is evidence to the contrary. He 'answers peremptorily' to the pretended
summons and charge pursued against him 'by the alleged bailies and community of the town
of Tayne', who had asked - no doubt in the immediately post-Reformation period that the
seal and charters should be handed over to them. In the preamble to his reasons for
refusing, he probably would not seek to minimise the importance of himself and his
office:-
' ... I am, as I have been these diverse years last bypast,
undoubted provost of the College Kirk of Tayne, and I and my predecessors provosts thereof
by reason of the said provostry were also provosts of the said town, so reputed and held
past memories of man, and the whole courts of the same during the space fore said fenced
in my predecessors' names as provosts thereof, and the bailies of the said town yearly
during the same space chosen and elected by me and my predecessors provosts foresaids, and
the whole escheats of the court of the said town by erection and foundation appertaining
to the said provost, and seeing I and my predecessors not only are provosts of the said
Kirk but also provosts of the said town and principal persons thereof. . .'
As well as the town's bailies, of whom two or even three are on
record together, there was also - and remained down to the Forty-Five - a heritable bailie
of the immunity of Tain, already mentioned more than once. This office had been granted in
1436 to the MacCullochs of Plaids by the Earl of Ross (who 17eserved the escheats to
himself, and in fact once deScribes himself as 'aldermannus' of Tain); after the earldom
WlIS forfeited the grant was renewed by the king. In 1552 Robert MacCulloch of Plaids sold
the lands and office to his uncle, Alexander Innes of Cadboll, who was charged by an order
from Queen Mary and her consort to hold courts within the town and immunity as often as
necessary. By an agreement reached with Nicholas Ross in 1566, the escheats of the court
were to go two parts to the 'utility and profit of the said provost', and the third part
to the bailie 'for service and execution of office'. Having passed to Innes of that Ilk,
the bailiary was sold by him in 1584 to George Sinclair of Mey, in Caithness, whose son
William married a daughter of Balnagown. The office of bailie - which simply signifies
deputy inay well have been profitable to the holder, to judge from lists ofthe
'casualties' levied.
It is plain from all this that Tain was becoming a place of
increasing importance for trade. This gave rise to further jealousy, and in 1580 Inverness
complained to the Convention of Royal Burghs against eight towns in the North for
usurping its trading rights. The Convention found that Dingwall, Chanonry, Rosemarkie,
Cromarty, Dornoch and Wick, since they were not enrolled and paid no stent, 'are nocht in
the societie of the remanent frie burrowis'; Tain alone of the group was ordered to appear
at the next meeting to exhibit the right, charter and privilege whereby it was erected
into a free burgh- "gif they ony have", adds the minute menacingly. Failing to appear, Tain was fined
for non-attendance (Inverness cannily objecting to such an implied recognition of
status), and the dispute dragged on. In 1582 the privy council, harking back to their
decision of 1501, again charged the people of Tain to stop buying skins, hides, iron,
salmon and other merchandise, 'aye and until' they showed any proper authority for doing
so.
Not long after this impasse had been reached, Tain received its
oldest extant charter, in which its claims were freely acknowledged in the formal
language of such documents. It is of interest also as one of the early grants by James VI
when he took control of affairs on reaching the age of 21 after a stormy minority, only a
little more than four months after his mother's execution. As part of the young king's
means.of ensuring an independent revenue, Parliament in July 1587 passed three Acts - one
in which he revoked all grants made to the prejudice of the crown during his mother's
reign and his own minority; another which annexed to the crown the lands belonging to the
prelates, the abbeys and monasteries, the 'college kirks' and other similar
establishments; and a third which empowered the king to grant lands in the earldom of
Ross.

Regent Moray pulpit
Six months later, at Holyrood House on 10th January, 1587/8, a
charter by King James in favour of the Royal Burgh of Tain passed the great seal. It
mentioned the destruction of its muniments, 'by barbarians and certain rebellious Ersch
subjects, as is contained in authentic testimonies produced before us'; the privileges
granted to it by former kings as a 'free royal burgh'; and the discharge of its obligation
to attend Parliament, Convention of Estates, and Convention of Royal Burghs, and
contribution to the burghs' taxes; and accordingly the king ratified, confirmed and
renewed its ancient privileges, infeftments and rights in the broadest terms. These
included the holding of land (to be perambulated yearly), the privilege of free markets,
the power to elect provost, bailies, dean of guild, treasurer, councillors and officers,
and the right to import and sell goods and collect and receive petty customs all 'as if
the infeftments of the burgh had not been destroyed and burnt'.
By ordering that the burgh's weekly market, hitherto held on the
Lord's Day, should for all time to come be held 'on the Sabbath Day called Setterday', the
charter sheds an interesting light on Sunday observance in King James's day, and
incidentally proves that Tain already had an established weekly market. It also authorised
and named a series of yearly markets.
Tain was the second of the Northern burghs to have its status
confirmed or acknowledged by King James. Dingwall was the first (1587), and Wick followed
in 1589, Chanonry in 1590, Inverness and Rosemarkie in 1592, and Cromarty in ] 593.
Dornoch did not become a royal burgh until 1628.